URGENT: County vote on development permits scheduled for July 14 — your signature is needed now.URGENT: County vote on development permits scheduled for July 14 — your signature is needed now.

About the Campaign

Why We're Fighting for Hiker Town

A grassroots movement born out of community concern - and growing into a coalition that decision-makers can't ignore.

Our Story

How It Started

In the summer of 2024, a small group of hikers noticed something wrong buried on page 847 of a Caltrans environmental document.

What they found was a proposed highway right-of-way that would carve directly through one of Southern California's most beloved and least-disturbed wilderness corridors - Hiker Town.

Within weeks, those hikers connected with local conservation groups, scientists, attorneys, and residents who shared their alarm. By October, 47 organizations had united under a single banner: Save Hiker Town.

Today, our coalition has grown to include researchers, legal advocates, artists, farmers, tribal members, and thousands of ordinary Californians who believe that some places are simply too precious to develop.

Community rally at Hiker Town

What We Stand For

Our Core Values

Conservation

Protecting wilderness in its natural state for present and future generations.

Community

Centering the voices of those who live with, work in, and depend on this landscape.

Accountability

Demanding rigorous environmental review and transparent decision-making processes.

Advocacy

Amplifying public opposition through education, organizing, and democratic participation.

Campaign History

Key Milestones

July 2024

First Threat Identified

Community members discover that an I-5 corridor expansion EIR includes Hiker Town land within the proposed right-of-way.

October 2024

Coalition Formed

47 local organizations and advocacy groups unite to form the Save Hiker Town Coalition, electing a steering committee.

January 2025

Petition Launched

The official online petition launches, collecting 1,000 signatures in the first 48 hours.

March 2025

Solar Threat Emerges

The coalition learns of a parallel 4,800-acre industrial solar proposal targeting the same wilderness corridor.

September 2025

Independent Studies Commissioned

Coalition funds independent wildlife corridor and hydrology studies to document environmental impacts.

May 2026

Legal Injunction Filed

Our legal team files a formal injunction to pause all development permits pending full CEQA review.

June 2026

10,000+ Signatures Milestone

The petition surpasses 10,000 signatures. A rally of 800+ supporters draws statewide media coverage.

Historical Context

The 2011 Report That Started It All

On June 11, 2011, economist Dr. Barney F. Hope submitted a formal report to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors documenting citizens' concerns about enforcement activity, energy development, and community impacts in Neenach and Western Antelope Valley - an early warning that went unheeded.

Document Date

June 11, 2011

Author

Dr. Barney F. Hope, Ph.D.

Submitted To

LA County Board of Supervisors

Area

Neenach & Western Antelope Valley

What Residents Reported

  • Unannounced inspection visits involving 6–7 vehicles, including Highway Patrol with armed personnel.
  • A reported inspection visit at approximately 4:30 AM.
  • An alleged incident in which a female resident was "thrown to the ground" by a County task force member, described in April 28, 2011 meeting minutes.
  • Deputy Sheriff David Kerr declined further involvement after the Sheriff's office concluded the inspections were not aligned with its responsibilities.
  • Landowners reported a shift in enforcement behavior after energy corporations began buying or leasing land in the area.

Reported Financial Impacts

Conroy Case

Mr. and Mrs. Conroy reportedly paid ~$17,000 in permit fees for a unit that was denied — and the fees were never refunded.

Hyatt Case

Mr. Hyatt reportedly faced severe financial strain due to numerous enforcement-related fines.

Skaggs Case

Mr. Richard Skaggs reportedly removed movie props later found to be legally acceptable, causing substantial loss.

Penna Claim

Mr. Dennis Penna reportedly stated an inspector suggested he could "get out from under" violations by selling his property to developers.

What the 2011 Report Recommended

For Residents

  • Complete notarized affidavits of all inspector interactions
  • Request ID from every inspection team member
  • Consult a civil rights attorney (42 U.S.C. § 1983)

For the County

  • Develop non-confrontational enforcement protocols
  • Notify owners of zoning changes by mail
  • Return permit fees when permits are denied

For Energy Developers

  • Disclose tax credits and job projections
  • Clarify how many jobs go to non-residents
  • Ensure mitigation funds benefit local communities

Claims above are presented as allegations described in the June 11, 2011 report submitted to Los Angeles County. Please review the original document for full context.

Our Team

The People Behind the Campaign

EV

Elena Vasquez

Campaign Director

Former California State Parks ranger with 18 years of wilderness management experience.

DJP

Dr. James Park

Lead Scientist

Wildlife biologist specializing in desert ecosystems and species-at-risk habitat assessment.

SO

Sarah Okafor

Legal Counsel

Environmental attorney with a decade of CEQA litigation and public lands defense experience.

MW

Marcus Webb

Community Organizer

Lifelong Lancaster resident and hiker who has led community outreach across 38 communities.

Campaign Active

Make Your Voice Heard.
Sign the Petition Today.

Over 12,847 people have already signed. Help us reach our goal of 25,000 signatures and send a clear message to decision-makers.